Friday 8 January 2010

Friday controversial thread - The right to die

Below is a story published on 31st Dec 2009 by http://compassionandchoices.org It seems that the courts of the world are recognising peoples right to choose to die. 


What is your view?


HELENA, MT – Montana physicians, terminally-ill patients and Compassion & Choices, the nation’s largest and oldest nonprofit organization working to improve care and expand choice at the end of life, today hailed the Montana Supreme Court’s ruling that terminally ill Montanans have the right to choose aid in dying under state law. There is no further appeal from this decision, as the Montana Supreme Court is the highest court available to decide State issues.
Compassion & Choices Legal Director Kathryn Tucker, co-counsel to the plaintiffs/respondents, said, “This case was about the right of mentally competent, terminally ill patients to request a prescription for medication from their doctors which they can ingest to bring about a peaceful death. The Montana Supreme Court has determined that this is a choice the public policy of Montana supports. Montanans trapped in an unbearable dying process deserve, and will now have, this end-of-life choice. This is the first state high court to find protection of this choice, and makes clear that in Montana, patients are able to make this choice and physicians can provide this care without risking sanction.”
Roberta King, of Missoula, the daughter of plaintiff Bob Baxter, said, “My father died without the peace and dignity he so dearly wanted for himself and others. He feared when he filed this lawsuit that he would not live long enough to benefit from it. I’m sure he would be deeply gratified that other terminally ill Montanans will have the choice and comfort that aid in dying affords them.”
Dr. Stephen Speckart, a Missoula cancer specialist and a plaintiff in the lawsuit, said, “This decision affirms that a terminal patient’s fundamental right to self-determination will guide end-of-life health decisions. I regularly treat patients dying from cancer, and many of these deaths are slow and painful. Terminal patients will no longer be forced to choose between unrelenting pain and an alert mental state as they approach the end of their lives from terminal diseases. The comfort this brings to their last days can have an immeasurable benefit.”
Missoula attorney Mark Connell, who argued the case to the Supreme Court on behalf of the plaintiff physicians and patients, described the decision as “a victory for individual rights over government control.” Connell added: “The Montana Supreme Court has now recognized that, where intensely personal and private choices regarding end-of-life care are involved, Montana law entrusts those decisions to the individuals whose lives are at stake, not the government. I know Bob Baxter would be very pleased that the court has now reaffirmed that these choices should be left to the terminally ill people in our state.”
Steve Johnson, 71, of Helena, is terminally ill with brain cancer, hailed the decision and asked the Montana medical profession to provide patients like himself with aid in dying. “I approach the end of my life with a clear mind, and I would like to work with my doctor to minimize the pain and maximize the peacefulness in my dying. I would like my physician to be able to respect and honor my choice to die with dignity. Adults like myself should have the option, if terminally ill, to request physician aid in dying.
It’s only compassionate to minimize unnecessary suffering at the end of life, and to let me make the choice about how much suffering to endure, based on my own values and beliefs,” said Johnson.
Montana State Sen. Christine Kaufmann, Rep. Dick Barrett and twenty-nine other state legislators; the American Medical Women’s Association, the American Medical Students Association, and a coalition of Montana clinicians; the American College of Legal Medicine; the American Civil Liberties Union of Montana; the Montana Human Rights Network; the Northwest Women’s Law Center; terminal patients’ surviving family members; Montana religious leaders; and Montana’s leading constitutional law experts had urged the Court to find in favor of the terminal patient’s right to receive aid in dying from their physicians.
Compassion & Choices encourages terminally ill patients to call 800 247-7421 if they would like information about aid in dying, or suggestions on how to open a dialogue with their physician and loved ones.
Final Gifts: Understanding the Special Awareness, Needs, and Communications of the Dying

6 comments:

  1. I am Switzerland on this!! I think people should choose..my fear is the choice being taken out of their hands..or taken to far!!! not sure what is right and what is wrong...

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think this is a good thing. People shouldn't be forced to suffer for months when the outcome will be the same: death. It is a huge strain on the lives of those still living.

    I am sure there could be abuses but it sounds like the law is a good one.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's something I walk the line on. I wrote a post about this back in October O8 when the young boy who had been paralysed from the neck down chose to go to Switzerland to die. While he wasn't dying anyway, he felt his quality of life was severly curtailed by his paralysis, but his decision met with outrage from many.

    I put forward an argument relating to abortion to try and make people think. While I don't personally believe in abortion, isn't that a person deciding that a living being within them is going to die, therefore taking the choice out of the unborn baby's hand. If someone can make a decision like this over someone else's life, then surely a person who no longer wants to live has the right to choose to end their life with dignity?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yeah I think if there are certain checks in place then then people should be able to end their life assuming of course that their quality of life has diminished.

    Not a pleasant topic to discuss but thanks for all your input. :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm 100% for the right to choose. I have spent many months on a rehab floor in a hospital, watching people try to squeeze some semblance of a life out of a body that didn't allow for much...it's heart-wrenching.

    I have limitations, but have learned how to life a very full life...I know where I draw the line if my ability to function at a certain level becomes less than I can bear, no one will stop me from how life will proceed for me...and my family is clear on my wishes.

    MHL

    ReplyDelete